Strategic investment in reputation

By Dirk Semmann, H. Krambeck, M. Milinski. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2004

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa35d66c83e54b40441b3c40de724e989523e15e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans (2011, background): “Consequently, human cognitive abilities allow individuals to be highly flexible in the level of cooperation they perform in response to whether there is the possibility for punishment (Fehr & Gächter, 2002), cues of reciprocity (Bateson et al., 2006; Semmann et al., 2004), whether they are competing”
Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review (2013, background): “However, evidence shows that rewards may be as effective as punishment and lead to higher total earnings without potential damage to reputation [147,148] or fear from retaliation [149].”
Strategies for cooperation in biological markets, especially for humans (2013, background): “This modulation of behavior could be strategic, as it was in studies where participants modulated their cooperation within an experiment according to their anonymity in a particular round (Barclay & Willer, 2007; Milinski et al., 2002b; Semmann et al., 2004).”
Patterns of participation and free riding in territorial conflicts among ringtailed lemurs (Lemur catta) (2004, background): “Such a system of interchange and reputation has recently been shown to increase participation in human cooperation, with interaction in one game influencing interaction in other games (Milinski et al. 2002; Semmann et al. 2004).”
Reputation is valuable within and outside one’s own social group (2005, methodology): “used information of whether their current decision was reputation-relevant or not (Semmann et al. 2004).”