In favor of the synthetic resolution to the person–situation debate

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Virtuous states and virtuous traits: How the empirical evidence regarding the existence of broad traits saves virtue ethics from the situationist critique (2014, background): “The person–situation debate does not address whether traits are intentionally changeable (Fleeson and Noftle, 2009).”
Character: The Prospects for a Personality-Based Perspective on Morality (2014, background): “If so, then what types of consistency do they exhibit (Fleeson & Noftle, 2009)?”
Properties of persons and situations related to overall and distinctive personality-behavior congruence (2012, background): “The slow and steady (or steady but slow) resolution of the classic ‘‘person-situation debate’’ (Fleeson & Noftle, 2009; Funder, 2009; Kenrick & Funder, 1988) makes this hypothesis less controversial than it would have been at one time.”
Whole Trait Theory (2014, background): “Although the trait approach would allow for some variability in behavior, it does not appear to allow the high degree of variable responding required in the social-cognitive approach (Allport, 1937; Fleeson & Noftle, 2009; Mischel, 1973).”
Predicting Counterproductive Work Behavior from Guilt Proneness (2012, background): “Aggregated behaviors are more consistent across time and situations compared to single behaviors, and they can be predicted more reliably by personality and situational variables (Fleeson and Noftle 2009; Funder 2008).”