A comparative study of Zuckerman's three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg's 50-bipolar adjectives

By Anton Aluja, Ó. García, L. F. García. 2002

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9a6314ea4dbc77baecf8ab84994b63d3e28b78f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Anton Aluja
2. L. F. García
3. Ó. García
4. J. Rossier
5. Veljko Jovanovic

In Clinical Psychology

1. Anton Aluja
2. J. Rossier
3. L. F. García
4. Ó. García
5. Veljko Jovanovic

Citations in the corpus

• Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples (2005, methodology): “This poor fit is probably due to the large number of parameters analysed (Raykov, 1998), as well as the strong assumptions for the simple structure model to fit (Aluja, Garc ıa, & Garc ıa, 2004).”