Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples

By Anton Aluja, Ó. García, J. Rossier, L. F. García. 2005

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ddf3814be98ed5fbdead11cca0579a886350bfa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Elmar Brähler
2. P. Herzberg

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. P. Herzberg

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. P. Herzberg
2. Cheng-Hsien Li
3. Victoria Savalei
4. Thomas A. Schmitt
5. D. Bandalos
6. E. Lloyd

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing the Big-Five Personality Domains via Short Forms A Cautionary Note and a Proposal (2006, result): “As in other studies, N presents the highest internal reliability index (Aluja et al., 2005; Gosling et al., 2003).”