Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit.
By Daniel T. Levin. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2000
607 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a95b3f59e4e3868d255ba33a5602495eb19dc418
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Kang Lee
- Paul C. Quinn
- David J. Lewkowicz
- A. Slater
- O. Pascalis
- D. Kelly
- Garrison W. Cottrell
- Kurt Hugenberg
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Kang Lee
- Paul C. Quinn
- A. Slater
- David J. Lewkowicz
- O. Pascalis
- D. Kelly
- Liezhong Ge
- Christian A. Meissner
Citations in the corpus
- Detecting Changes in Novel, Complex Three-dimensional Objects (2000, background): “…actively differentiating members of a group from each other, allowing observers familiar with a category to be able to form more precise representations of individuals (Levin, 1998) and to focus on those object features that are central and therefore most diagnostic (Gibson & Gibson, 1955).”
- Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces (2006, background): “It is generally acknowledged that the difference in amount of visual experience people have with same- and other-race faces may account for the OR effect (Chance, Turner, & Goldstein, 1982; Dehon & Bre ´dart, 2001; Elliott, Wills, & Goldstein, 1973; Goldstein & Chance, 1985; Levin, 2000; Meissner ”
- On Construing Others: Category and Stereotype Activation from Facial Cues (2006, background): “…by social perceivers is hampered by the field’s tendency to overlook the early perceptual processes involved in person construal (but see Blair et al., 2004; Cloutier et al., 2005; Levin, 2000; Livingston & Brewer, 2002; Maddox, 2004; Mason & Macrae, 2004; Quinn & Macrae, 2005; Zebrowitz, 1997).”
- Ageing faces in ageing minds: A review on the own-age bias in face recognition (2013, background): “In addition, support for the idea of processing outgroup faces at a categorical level comes from visual search tasks, in which other-race faces were detected faster among own-race distracters relative to the reversed situation (Levin, 1996, 2000).”
- Reversibility of the Other-Race Effect in Face Recognition During Childhood (2005, background): “In adults, evidence for this experience hypothesis is conflicting (Furl, Phillips, & O’Toole, 2002; Levin, 2000).”
- Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces (2004, background): “It is generally acknowledged that the difference in amount of visual experience people have with same- and other-race faces may account for the OR effect (Chance, Turner, & Goldstein, 1982; Dehon & Brédart, 2001; Elliott, Wills, & Goldstein, 1973; Goldstein & Chance, 1985; Levin, 2000; Meissner & Br”
- SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics. (2008, background): “In addition, Levin found that Caucasian basketball fans who are familiar with many African-American basketball players do not show this other-race search advantage (Levin, 2000).”
- Where the division lies: Common ingroup identity moderates the cross-race facial-recognition effect (2010, background): “CRE? Previous theory ( Levin, 2000 ) and research (Study 1 of Shriver et al., 2008) suggest different encoding processes for in and out-”
- Two Faces of the Other-Race Effect: Recognition and Categorisation of Caucasian and Chinese Faces (2009, methodology): “When participants are asked to categorise faces by their race, they respond faster to other-race faces than to own-race faces (Caldara et al 2004; Levin 1996, 2000; Valentine and Endo 1992).”
- Individuation Motivation and Face Experience Can Operate Jointly to Produce the Own-Race Bias (2012, methodology): “For example, the featureselection model (Levin, 1996, 2000) suggests that the ORB is the result of perceivers quickly processing CR faces in a categorical manner, while instead processing OR faces in a more deliberate and individuated mode.”
- Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. (2005, background): “Adults very rapidly make judgements and categorize people according to ethnicity (Levin, 2000; Valentine & Endo, 1992).”
- Memory for own- and other-race faces: A dual-process approach (2005, methodology): “First, some researchers have suggested that individuals may generate a categorization response when presented with other-race faces (Levin, 1996, 2000; MacLin & Malpass, 2001, 2003; Sporer, 2001).”
- Race and gender on the brain: electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. (2003, background): “When attending to race, a target who differed from the preceding context in terms of only race attracted greater processing than someone who differed only in terms of gender, F(1,20) = 174.”
- Learning Race from Face: A Survey (2014, background): “Other cognitive experiments in [11], [12], [32] have also indicated the existence of racial features as a salient visual factor.”