Where the division lies: Common ingroup identity moderates the cross-race facial-recognition effect

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the epistemic costs of implicit bias (2011, background): “Since the ‘‘ability to extract information from an environment improves with experience,’’ it is perhaps unsurprising that ‘‘[i]ndividuals are more accurate at recognizing types of faces with which they have had more exposure’’ (Hehman et al. 2010, p. 445, citing Sporer 2001).”