Neoliberalism and the Environment in Latin America

By D. Liverman, Silvina Vilas. 2006

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9475d61256ce8081eb1163e0f2f4451514dd54b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. K. Zimmerer
2. D. Klooster
3. P. McElwee
4. D. Liverman
5. Chris Bacon
6. Kean Birch

In Economics and Econometrics

1. K. Zimmerer
2. P. McElwee
3. K. Mcafee
4. W. Solecki
5. K. O’Brien
6. R. Leichenko
7. Adam Bumpus
8. D. Klooster

In Global and Planetary Change

1. P. McElwee
2. D. Liverman
3. K. Mcafee
4. K. Zimmerer
5. Adam Bumpus
6. D. Klooster
7. R. Leichenko
8. P. Robbins

Citations in the corpus

• Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or problem? (2012, background): “…mismanagement of public water supplies (Prudham, 2004; Loftus and McDonald, 2001) and increased deforestation after deregulation and structural adjustments (Owusu, 1998; Shimamoto et al., 2004) have been documented, while in other areas the outcomes are more ambiguous (Liverman and Vilas, 2006).”
• Accumulation by Decarbonization and the Governance of Carbon Offsets (2008, background): “…the creation, consumption, and governance of offsets is also a response to the recent call for an environmental economic geography and for a focus on regulation and nature under neoliberalism (Bridge 2002; Bridge and Jonas 2002; Gibbs 2006; Liverman and Vilas 2006; McCarthy and Prudham 2004).”
• Biological Diversity in Agriculture and Global Change (2010, methodology): “This market integration has been guided chiefly through neoliberal policy approaches, such as North American Free Trade Agreement agricultural and environmental arrangements (130, 131).”
• Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on A Social-Ecological Analysis of Diversified Farming Systems: Benefits, Costs, Obstacles, and Enabling Policy Frameworks Diversified Farming Systems: An Agroecological, Systems-based Alternative to Modern Industrial Agriculture (2012, background): “…the advantages of economies of scale, field and farm sizes increased in some areas, while noncrop areas in and around farms decreased, leading to higher levels of homogeneity at both the field and landscape scale (Cochrane 1993, Tscharntke et al. 2005, Liverman and Vilas 2006, Snapp et al. 2010).”
• Land-Change Science and Political Ecology: Similarities, Differences, and Implications for Sustainability Science (2008, background): “Specifically, the collective lessons of the research stress that the forest transition thesis reflects processes embedded in the history of midlatitude forest use, a history that may not play out similarly in other areas or biomes of the world (154, 157).”
• Standardizing sustainable development? The Forest Stewardship Council's plantation policy review process as neoliberal environmental governance. (2010, background): “Neoliberalism should not be seen as a monolithic construct with homogenous outcomes everywhere, however (McCarthy and Prudham, 2004, p. 276; McCarthy and Prudham, 2004; Perreault and Martin, 2005; Radcliffe, 2005; Liverman and Vilas, 2006).”
• Payments for Ecosystem Services in Mexico: Nature, Neoliberalism, Social Movements, and the State (2010, background): “The discourse of environmental services commodification resonates with the neoliberal rhetoric that pervades international environmental policymaking ( Liverman 2004 ; Liverman and Vilas 2006 ).”
• Making environmental law for the market: the emergence, character, and implications of Chile's environmental regime (2011, unknown): “See e.g. López (2006), Asenjo (2006), and Pizarro (2006).”
• Climate Change and the Global Financial Crisis: A Case of Double Exposure (2010, background): “…and teleconnected vulnerabilities, and relationships between neoliberal policies and the capacity to adapt to climate change (e.g., O’Brien and Leichenko 2003; O’Brien et al. 2004; Eakin 2006; Liverman and Vilas 2006; Keskitalo 2008; Adger, Eakin, and Winkels 2009; Silva, Eriksen, and Ombe 2009).”
• The Handbook of Neoliberalism (2016, background): “Chile also experienced rapid growth of export-oriented forestry after its forests were privatized and all export restrictions lifted, and there are links between these policy changes and the loss of old-growth forests with widespread conversion to plantation forestry (see Clapp 1998; Liverman and Vi”