The AR-index: complementing the h-index

By Bihui Jin. 2007

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9142817202db76d9929d1601be220de87761ef6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009, methodology): “Liang et al. (2007) critically observed that with the A-index, " the better scientist is 'punished' for having a higher h-index, as the A-index involves a division by h " .”
Reflections on recent developments of the h-index and h-type indices (2008, methodology): “Jin Bihui introduced the AR-index (or its square the AR2-index) in order to incorporate the age of published articles (Jin[15]).”
A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015, background): “ata is always highly skewed. Currently Google Scholar Metrics13 implements a 5-year h-index and 5-year m-index. 13 http://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?view_op=top_venues&hl=en 16 o The r-index (Jin, 2007) which is the square root of the sum of the citations of the h-core papers. This is becaus”
When Less Is More: Effects of Grade Skipping on Adult STEM Productivity Among Mathematically Precocious Adolescents (2013, methodology): “The age-weighted citation rate (AWCR; Jin, 2007) reflects the annual rate of citations received by individual’s entire body of work, adjusted for the age of each cited publication, calculated by taking the sum of total citations of every publication by an author after dividing the citations from…”
The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index (2007, background): “The authors should add the definition of the A-index instead of referring to Jin (2007) and mention the date for which the h-index has been calculated since the h-index is continuously changing.”