The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index

By Bihui Jin, Liming Liang, R. Rousseau, Leo Egghe. 2007

646 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c6a073b7ec7d56fbc1db0ccff9d06ed19fffbab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Jia-lin Hou
2. Xiucai Yang
3. Ku Leuven
4. Mu-Hsuan Huang
5. Pei-Shan Chi
6. Chaomei Chen
7. R. Rousseau
8. H. Eugene Stanley

In Statistics and Probability

1. Jia-lin Hou
2. Xiucai Yang
3. Chaomei Chen
4. Ku Leuven
5. Mu-Hsuan Huang
6. Pei-Shan Chi
7. An Zeng
8. Jianlin Zhou

Citations in the corpus

• The science of science: from the perspective of complex systems (2017, background): “proposed a new index called the R-index by eliminating the division by h and adding a square root [194].”
• The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations (2009, background): “Numerical relations between the e-index and some other h-type indices The relations between the e-index and some other h-type indices, including the a-index [7] and the R-index [14], are presented briefly as follows.”
• Emerging trends and new developments in information science: a document co-citation analysis (2009–2016) (2018, background): “Since Jorge Hirsch (2005) proposed the h-index, is has drawn increasingly higher attention by researchers, among which Egghe (2006), Jin et al. (2007), Bornmann and Daniel (2008), Bornmann et al. (2011), and Waltman and Van Eck (2012a) have a relatively large influence.”
• A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009, background): “Randar (2007) [11] and Egghe (2006) [12] propose the g-index as a modification of the H-index.”
• A Comparative Analysis of the Application of H-index, G-index, and A-index in Institutional-Level Research Evaluation (2010, methodology): “, 2007; Schreiber, 2008a, 2008b), rankings (Bornmann, Marx, & Schier, 2009), ratios (Jin et al., 2007; Schreiber, 2008b), and the Spearman’s rank-order correlation coefficient (Bornmann et al.”
• Reflections on recent developments of the h-index and h-type indices (2008, methodology): “This disadvantage is overcome by another htype index, called the R-index (Jin et al.[19]).”
• Library 2.0: A guide to participatory library service (2008, neutral): “Besides the advantages, a number of disadvantages of the h index have been named in recent months (for an overview, see Bornmann & Daniel, 2007b; Jin, Liang, Rousseau, & Egghe, 2007; Liu & Rousseau, 2007).”