Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets

By Benjamin Burkhard, F. Kroll, S. Nedkov, Felix Müller. 2012

1,998 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ff3547c7d821619a2cc3ee9fb98132a3cd6130d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

“Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making (2013, methodology): “…‘‘water purification’’. ecosystem services conservation, the implementation level requires decisions about the practical management of ecosystems and the sustainable use of their services, e.g. in terms of landscape planning (Burkhard et al., 2012; De Groot et al., 2010; Prager et al., 2012).”
From Multifunctionality to Multiple Ecosystem Services? A Conceptual Framework for Multifunctionality in Green Infrastructure Planning for Urban Areas (2014, background): “Qualitative assessments that, for instance, define ES supply relatively based on expert knowledge can be used to harmonize data from different sources and cover a range of ES (Burkhard et al. 2012; Busch et al. 2012).”
Mapping social–ecological systems: Identifying ‘green-loop’ and ‘red-loop’ dynamics based on characteristic bundles of ecosystem service use (2015, result): “Our results therefore emphasize that ES potential or production in an area does not necessarily translate into ES use, a fact that is increasingly acknowledged in multi-indicator ES assessments (Burkhard et al., 2012; Crossman et al., 2013).”
Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management (2016, methodology): “The biophysical methods include spreadsheet/GIS approaches (Burkhard et al., 2012; Vihervaara et al., 2012); Quickscan (2015); Bayesian Belief Networks (Smith et al.”
Research, part of a Special Feature on Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Cultural Landscapes: Analysis and Management Options A Classification of Landscape Services to Support Local Landscape Planning (2014, background): “On the one hand, the assumption of landscape as a whole involves mapping landscape services based on landscape patterns, i.e., landscape types, instead of land cover (Burkhard et al. 2012).”
European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review (2013, background): “The value of the ecosystem services depends on both the capacity of the landscape to deliver services and the socio-economic context (Burkhard et al. 2012; Termorshuizen et al. 2009).”
A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation (2014, background): “Bio-physical, GIS-based, statistical, qualitative, causal loop, look-up table, willingness-to-pay, survey, interview, conjoint analysis, prize, trading, REDD, risk assessment, empirical, other, not applicable Are trade-offs considered?”