Fashion retailing and the bottom line: The effects of generational cohorts, gender, fashion fanship, attitudes and impulse buying on fashion expenditure
By R. Pentecost, Lynda Andrews. 2010
223 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8d00dfe6eca9cbdb82c468ff39721fcde3b12dd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Philipp A. Rauschnabel
- William C. Keneson
- Thurasamy Ramayah
- Gary R. Holmes
- Clinton Amos
- Stephanie Hui-Wen Chuah
- Nina Krey
Citations in the corpus
- Wearable technologies: The role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption (2016, background): “The correlations reported in this research (see Appendix A) do not show any significant effects for age and gender, although males are generally more technology (Chang et al., 2014; Huffman, Whetten, & Huffman, 2013) and females more fashion (Handa & Khare, 2013; Pentecost & Andrews, 2010) focused.”
- A meta-analysis of consumer impulse buying (2014, background): “Retailers, armed with the knowledge that consumers frequently make impulse purchases, are interested in the impulse buying phenomenon because they hope to appeal to consumers’ impulsive tendencies (e.g., Clover, 1950; Kacen et al., 2012; Pentecost and Andrews, 2010; Puri, 1996).”