Going beyond panaceas

By Elinor Ostrom, Marco A. Janssen, J. Marty Anderies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007

917 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8c34716c3024fba4336db40e00eb124275bdd0f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to “living with” (2013, background): “ecosystem or a species is often a contentious issue whereby many distinct views and perspectives come into play depending on one’s social, economic, educational, and political background (Forsyth 2003; White 2006; Ostrom et al. 2007).”
Public Participation and Institutional Fit: A Social–Psychological Perspective (2013, background): “…factor for the successful management of common-pool natural resources—for example, Ostrom’s (1990, 2010) seminal design principle that “most individuals affected by a policy regime can participate in modifying it,” yet argue it should not be used in every situation (e.g., Ostrom et al. 2007).”
Complexity in climate-change impacts: an analytical framework for effects mediated by plant disease (2011, background): “The scale and type of policies necessary for natural resource management may vary widely from one setting to another, calling for adaptive management approaches (Ostrom, 2007; Ostrom et al., 2007).”
Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win‐win solutions (2013, background): “We already know that the track record of using panaceas in environmental policy “is one of repeated failures” (Ostrom et al. 2007) and therefore we need to avoid making the same mistakes again.”
The Multiple Facets of Co-Production: Building on the work of Elinor Ostrom (2014, background): “What works well in one set of circumstances may be unsuitable for another – a theme that permeated much of Ostrom’s work (Ostrom 2007; Ostrom et al. 2007; see also Alford and O’Flynn 2012, esp. ch. 10).”
Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver (2009, background): “…from around the world – from pioneering local leaders to government bureaucracies, and from traditional cultures to major corporations (eg a new experi- mental wing of Goldman Sachs; Daily and Ellison 2002; Bhagwat and Rutte 2006; Kareiva and Marvier 2007; Ostrom et al. 2007; Goldman et al. 2008).”
A Revolution Without People? Closing the People-Policy Gap in Aquaculture Development (2015, background): “Many socio-economic variables related to aquaculture can be ―broken down‖ into a complex series of ―second-tier variables‖ (e.g. Ostrom et al., 2007) which are interrelated across different spatial and temporal scales.”
Modeling water scarcity and droughts for policy adaptation to climate change in arid and semiarid regions (2015, background): “Some authors warn against the use of a single type of policy instrument (panacea) for solving water management problems (Ostrom et al., 2007).”
Research, part of a Special Feature on Do we need new management paradigms to achieve sustainability in tropical forests? Tropical Deforestation, Community Forests, and Protected Areas in the Maya Forest (2008, background): “There are no panaceas and no single form of management is superior to others a priori for conservation and sustainable development (Ostrom and Nagendra 2006, Ostrom et al. 2007).”
Urban Sustainability and Resilience: From Theory to Practice (2016, background): “Building on Ostrom [23], Schauppenlehner-Kloyber et al.”