Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver

By Gretchen Daily, Stephen Polasky, J. Goldstein, P. Kareiva, H. Mooney, Liba Pejchar, Taylor H. Ricketts, J. Salzman, R. Shallenberger. 2009

2,045 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a20cd573efefe1eac59f51faf28e0fbc18d69e35

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

“Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making (2013, background): “Following some recent suggestions for more socially engaged and open assessments of ecosystem services (e.g. Cowling et al., 2008; Daily et al., 2009; Menzel and Teng, 2009; Norton and Noonan, 2007; Prager et al., 2012), we investigated this assumption in the context of the PRESS (PEER Research on…”
Ecosystem services (2011, neutral): “The promise it appears to hold for making economic arguments about the importance of environment to people has, perhaps, most of all stimulated interest among decision makers, and, as Daily et al. (2009) have noted, perhaps we are at a point where it is ‘time to deliver’.”
Ecosystem Services: Origins, Contributions, Pitfalls, and Alternatives (2013, background): “…does not necessarily imply an economic valuation of human well-being, the vast majority of social scientists associated with the MA are economists (Daily et al. 2009) and most of the assessment work being done under the banner of ES is economic in its practice (e.g., Sukhdev 2008) or at least in…”
Conservation opportunities across the world's anthromes (2014, background): “Ecosystem services Daily et al. (2009) Give ‘natural capital’, which produces ecosystem services, adequate weight”
Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning (2013, methodology): “Multi-criteria analysis has been applied to numerous marine 70 applications [34-37] and there has been recent progress applying these ideas to managing 71 ecosystem services [20, 38-41].”
Multi-functional landscapes in semi arid environments: implications for biodiversity and ecosystem services (2010, methodology): “…of a single function landscape manipulated to, for example, either produce food or serve as a recreation area, to a landscape offering multiple environmental, social and economic benefits (de Groot 2006; Wiggering et al. 2006; Carpenter et al. 2009; Daily et al. 2009; Lovell and Johnston 2009a).”
Mainstreaming ecosystem services into EU policy (2013, background): “Mainstreaming of ES into policies means ensuring that the positive or negative impacts of policies on ecosystems and their services are considered during both the policy design and the policy implementation phase [5,6].”
A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions (2016, background): “But over the last decade and a half, the concept has gained considerable attraction across science and policy arenas, especially on how the ecosystem services can be defined, valued and integrated into conservation and sustainable development agendas (Daily et al., 2009; de Groot et al., 2010 and La”
Beyond “benefits”? Looking at ecosystem services through the capability approach (2012, background): “Turning from conceptual foundations to practical applications of the ESS concept, the increasingly popular PES schemes have arguably gained primacy in policy-making (Daily et al., 2009; Kinzig et al., 2011; for a comparison of PES schemes in developing and developed countries, see Wunder et al., 200”
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: The Ecological and Economic Foundations (TEEB D0). (2010, methodology): “The TEEB interim report’s valuation framework is largely consistent with others recently proposed in the analysis undertaken by the US National Research Council (NRC 2005), the Natural Capital Project (Daily et al. 2009), the EPA Science Advisory Board (EPA-SAB 2009), Valuing the Arc (Mwakalila et a”
Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2009, background): “Yet, only rarely is the success of these projects evaluated by using appropriate data and indicators (51, 52).”
NEW DIRECTIONS FOR URBAN ECONOMIC MODELS OF LAND USE CHANGE: INCORPORATING SPATIAL DYNAMICS AND HETEROGENEITY (2010, background): “…Levin, 2006; Liu et al., 2007; Turner, Lambin, and Reenberg, 2007; Grimm et al., 2008a), including the cumulative environmental impacts of individual and community resource decisions and the behavioral responses of individuals to policies that seek to manage these impacts (Daily et al., 2009).”