Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to “living with”

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

‘Measurementality’ in Biodiversity Governance: Knowledge, Transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Ipbes) (2014, background): “Here, we see a particular economic discourse emerging that conceives biodiversity as ecosystem services (Turnhout et al, 2013).”
Connecting SDG 14 with the other Sustainable Development Goals through marine spatial planning (2017, background): “Critics consider that the valuation of ecosystem services and the subsequent employment of market-based mechanisms to ensure the continuity of their provision may lead to the privatisation or commodification of nature [55,56].”
Socio‐economic impact classification of alien taxa (SEICAT) (2018, background): “To capture the full socio-economic impacts of an alien taxon, dimensions that go beyond monetary costs must be considered (Turnhout et al. 2013).”
Making sense of environmental values: a typology of concepts (2017, background): “In a similar vein, Turnhout et al. (2013) suggest that research on environmental values should (1) consider a diversity of human relations with ecosystems, (2) draw on and build upon already existing and place-based social– natural relationships, and (3) refrain from instituting single measures of…”
The political ecology of ecosystem services (2015, unknown): “These could be experiential, spiritual, or based on other metaphors like„stewardship‟ or „living with‟ (Turnhout et al., 2013).”