Impacts of biodeposits from suspended mussel (Mytilus edulis L.) culture on the surrounding surficial sediments

By J. Chamberlain, T. Fernandes, P. Read, Thom Nickell, I. Davies. 2001

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a88bffff59da05c0ae5f1b6d5d53f58bcedb9654

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Impacts of bottom and suspended cultures of mussels Mytilus spp. on the surrounding sedimentary environment and macrobenthic biodiversity (2009, background): “The elevated POC, PON, phosphorus, and phaeo concentrations in the surWcial sediments in the raft area in Ria de Vigo are consistent with measurements of enhanced organic input elsewhere (Dahlback and Gunnarsson 1981; Chamberlain et al. 2001; Stenton-Dozey et al. 2001; Christensen et al., 2003; Ha”
The ecological role of bivalve shellfish aquaculture in the estuarine environment: A review with application to oyster and clam culture in West Coast (USA) estuaries (2009, background): “In some cases enrichment either does not occur or does not alter infauna (Grant et al., 1995; Chamberlain et al., 2001; Crawford et al., 2003), while in others, significant effects have been documented (Dahlback and Gunnarsson, 1981; Mattsson and Linden, 1983; Kaiser et al., 1998; Mirto et al.,…”
Local enhancement of epibenthic macrofauna by aquaculture activities (2008, methodology): “The taxa that contributed most to separating treatments based on multivariate community structure were identified using the SIMPER procedure with PRIMER (Clarke & Gorley 2001).”
Effects of Bivalve Aquaculture on the Environment and Their Possible Mitigation: A Review (2014, background): “ISSN: 2150-3508 FAJ, an open access journal including little or negligible impact, low sedimentation rates and absence of major changes in benthic infauna [20-22].”
Influence of suspended and off-bottom mussel culture on the sea bottom and benthic habitats: a review. (2011, background): “This is seen from studies conducted along transects from culture sites (e.g., Chamberlain et al. 2001; Callier et al. 2008; Ysebaert et al. 2009).”
Evaluation of indicators used to detect mussel farm influence on the benthos: Two case studies in the Magdalen Islands, Eastern Canada (2008, background): “Such measures have often been used to assess the effect of bivalve farming on the benthic environment (particularlyH’, e.g., Mattsson and Lindén, 1983; Grant et al., 1995; Stenton-Dozey et al., 1999; Chamberlain et al., 2001; Yokoyama, 2002; Crawford et al., 2003; Miron et al., 2005; Callier et al.,”
Analysis of coastal and offshore aquaculture: Application of the FARM model to multiple systems and shellfish species (2009, background): “…cultured bivalves provide a means of top–down control of eutrophication symptoms associated with excessive loading of nutrients to the coastal zone (Ferreira et al., 2007b; Xiao et al., 2007), although shellfish culture is not without its own environmental impacts (Chamberlain et al., 2001).”
Assessing the suitability of a range of benthic indices in the evaluation of environmental impact of fin and shellfish aquaculture located in sites across Europe (2009, unknown): “However, sometimes, as found at some of the ECASA sites (this study) and elsewhere, the responses were different fromwhat would be expected, as described by Edgar et al. (2005), Sanz-Lázaro and Marín (2006), Aguado-Giménez et al.”
Effects of shellfish farming on the benthic environment (2003, background): “The results suggest that the effects of shellfish farming activities on the benthic environment under and near subtidal shellfish farms were low, and far less than results obtained from similar research conducted around salmon farms in Tasmania (Crawford et al., 2001, 2002). In contrast to condition”