Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges.
By B. Van Meerbeek, J. de Munck, Y. Yoshida, S. Inoue, M. Vargas, P. Vijay, Kirsten L. Van Landuyt, P. Lambrechts, G. Vanherle. Operative dentistry, 2003
1,858 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a85dcf9565a49580260ba7a9b1a8cb810f452f62
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- B. Meerbeek
- L. Breschi
- M. Peumans
- Kirsten L. Van Landuyt
- André Poitevin
- A. Mazzoni
- A. Mine
- J. Munck
Citations in the corpus
- Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. (2005, background): “This superior performance in laboratory and clinical research must probably to a great extent be attributed to optimal enamel interlocking and dentin hybridization, as was demonstrated in several ultra-morphologic interface analyses [1,9,35,36].”
- Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. (2007, methodology): “The adhesives are categorized according to the classification of Van Meerbeek [5].”
- State of the art of self-etch adhesives. (2011, background): “[27] Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al.”
- Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. (2008, methodology): “The current classification of adhesives relies on the number of the steps constituting the system [11].”
- A Critical Review of the Durability of Adhesion to Tooth Tissue: Methods and Results (2005, background): “1; Van Meerbeek et al., 2001, 2003).”
- Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. (2010, background): “[6] Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al.”