A Critical Review of the Durability of Adhesion to Tooth Tissue: Methods and Results

By J. Munck, K. Landuyt, M. Peumans, André Poitevin, P. Lambrechts, M. Braem, B. Meerbeek. Journal of dentistry research, 2005

2,047 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives (2010, unknown): “Etch-and-rinse adhesives that utilize 3-steps aremore durable than 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesives [64].”
Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. (2010, background): “Water storage and thermo-cycling are the most popular artificial aging methods, but also other methodologies as mechanical loading and degradation by enzymes and various chemical substances have been employed in literature [3].”
Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. (2007, background): “sorption [37], more nanoleakage [38], degradation of the tooth-composite bond [39] and more leaching of residual uncured monomers and thus lower biocompatibility of dental adhesives.”
Chlorhexidine Arrests Subclinical Degradation of Dentin Hybrid Layers in vivo (2005, background): “Considerable evidence has accumulated over the past decade, based onboth in vitro and in vivo work, that bonds created in dentin by resinbased adhesives may not be as durable as was previously conjectured (De Munck et al., 2005; Frankenberger et al., 2005).”
Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. (2008, background): “This additional interaction acting synergistically with superior infiltration of adhesive monomers into the decalcified substrate is claimed to enhance bond stability over time [7].”