Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials.

By M. Peumans, P. Kanumilli, J. Munck, K. Landuyt, P. Lambrechts, B. Meerbeek. Dental Materials, 2005

903 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Limitations in Bonding to Dentin and Experimental Strategies to Prevent Bond Degradation (2011, background): “Previous studies have correlated the incorporation of hydrophilic and acidic resin monomers in adhesive blends with decreased longevity of resin-dentin bonds (Peumans et al., 2005), because these hydrophilic resins expedite water sorption (Malacarne et al., 2006).”
Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. (2007, background): “The good in vitro and clinical outcome of Clearfil SE Bond from Kuraray [8,78,79], which is a 2-SEA that contains 10-MDP, may be partly attributed to the intense chemical adhesion with tooth tissue.”
Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. (2010, methodology): “clinical effectiveness of a restorative treatment [2,6,141,142].”
State of the art of self-etch adhesives. (2011, background): “[1] Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B.”
Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. (2012, background): “[95] Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B.”