Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation.

By Loren H. Rieseberg. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2001

1,402 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a82f0c1769d8e76ced323d443f8757bc38758cc3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. P. Nosil
2. Pamela S. Soltis
3. D. Soltis
4. D. Lowry
5. Petr Pyšek
6. D. Richardson
7. R. Frankham
8. A. Hoffmann

In Genetics

1. R. Frankham
2. P. Nosil
3. D. Lowry
4. Matthew W. Hahn
5. A. Hoffmann
6. James Mallet
7. C. Pinho
8. S. Edmands

Citations in the corpus

• Genealogical concordance between the mating type locus and seven other nuclear genes supports formal recognition of nine phylogenetically distinct species within the Fusarium graminearum clade. (2004, background): “, 2002) is likely indicative of large-scale chromosomal rearrangements between the parental strains and is consistent with an interspecific cross (Rieseberg, 2001).”
• THE BIOLOGY OF SPECIATION (2010, background): “Chromosomal rearrangements, such as inversions, can have an impact on divergence by creating linkage groups of loci involved in multiple forms of reproductive isolation that cannot be disrupted by recombination (Noor et al. 2001; Rieseberg 2001).”
• Geographic distribution and genotypic composition of invasive hybrid watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum × M. sibiricum) populations in North America (2007, background): “For example, recent studies have demonstrated that three Helianthus species of hybrid origin survive in extreme habitats not suitable for their parental taxa while retaining unique combinations of genes acquired in linkage groups typifying each of their parental species (Rieseberg et al. 2003; Ries”
• Revisiting the Impact of Inversions in Evolution: From Population Genetic Markers to Drivers of Adaptive Shifts and Speciation? (2008, background): “…fail to reduce fitness (Bardhan & Sharma 2000, Coyne et al. 1993, John 1981), a second class of chromosomal speciation models has been developed based on the other main property of inversions—reduced recombination between inverted and noninverted genomic regions (Noor et al. 2001, Rieseberg 2001).”
• Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species (2004, background): “Several striking examples have recently been reported, in which genes for reproductive isolation are closely associated with chromosome rearrangements that prevent recombination (Noor et al. 2001; Rieseberg 2001; Feder et al. 2003).”
• What is Speciation Genomics? The roles of ecology, gene flow, and genomic architecture in the formation of species (2018, neutral): “Rieseberg LH. 2001.”
• Multilocus Methods for Estimating Population Sizes, Migration Rates and Divergence Time, With Applications to the Divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis (2004, neutral): “Nature 418: 145–151. cies (Noor et al. 2001a; Rieseberg 2001).”
• The evolutionary improbability of 'generalism' in nature, with special reference to insects (2011, neutral): “Rieseberg LH. 2001.”
• The role of hybridization in plant speciation. (2009, background): “For further discussion of isolating mechanisms in plants, we refer readers to both recent reviews (25, 81, 112, 113, 152, 153, 156, 169) and classic overviews (e.”
• Ecotypes and the controversy over stages in the formation of new species (2012, positive): “Rieseberg LH. 2001.”
• Chromosome triplication found across the tribe Brassiceae. (2005, background): “Rearrangements (such as translocations or inversions) might reduce/ prevent undesirable pairing and recombination between homeologous chromosomes/chromosome regions (Rieseberg 2001) and lead to reproductive isolation between populations eventually contributing to speciation processes.”
• THE GENETIC ARCHITECTURE OF ADAPTATION UNDER MIGRATION–SELECTION BALANCE (2011, background): “Clustering of reproductive isolating mechanisms into “islands of genomic divergence” is also predicted in models of chromosomal speciation (Noor et al. 2001; Rieseberg 2001; Navarro and Barton 2003; Gavrilets 2004; Nosil et al. 2009).”
• Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management (2006, background): “It follows that genic incompatibilities should evolve most rapidly in species with a large X chromosome and a highly degenerate Y chromosome (Rieseberg 2001; Coyne & Orr 2004).”
• A Widespread Chromosomal Inversion Polymorphism Contributes to a Major Life-History Transition, Local Adaptation, and Reproductive Isolation (2010, neutral): “rearranged regions during meiosis [1,5,7,10].”
• Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence (2009, background): “…1986; King & Jukes 1969; Ohta 1992, 2002), variable mutation rates (Balloux & LugonMoulin 2002; Hedrick 2005; Noor & Feder 2006), the genomic distribution and effect size of genes under selection (Orr 2005), and chromosomal structure (Noor et al. 2001; Rieseberg 2001; Ortiz-Barrientos et al. 2002).”
• Genomic Islands of Speciation in Anopheles gambiae (2005, background): “Recent work has shown that inversions may facilitate speciation by creating linkage disequilibrium between these genes [39–41].”