The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation.
By M. Meseguer, J. Herrero, A. Tejera, K. Hilligsøe, N. Ramsing, J. Remohí. 2011
840 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Immunology, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Immunology
In Molecular Biology
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- Ethical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence to Select Embryos in In Vitro Fertilization (2021, background): “However, the availability of numerous data points made available by recent advances, such as with time-lapse videography [10], has enabled novel parameters to be measured for embryo selection [11, 12, 13].”
- Clinical significance of intercellular contact at the four-cell stage of human embryos, and the use of abnormal cleavage patterns to identify embryos with low implantation potential: a time-lapse study. (2015, methodology): “The present study, with the assistance of continuous observations via time-lapse equipment, aimed to investigate [1] the prevalence and dynamic change of ICCP number in goodquality four-cell stage human embryos unimpeded by the presence of fragments, [2] the morphokinetics and implantation results o”
- Between-laboratory reproducibility of time-lapse embryo selection using qualitative and quantitative parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020, methodology): “However, after removal of the Rubio study [20] from the pooled analysis (if regarded as an internal validation since both laboratories are associated within the same group), the predictive power of the Meseguer model [1] decreased and lost statistical significance (n = 1155; AUC = 0.510[0.473–0.547]”
- Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology† (2020, methodology): “The year of 2011 marked the official introduction of TLT in the embryology laboratory, when embryo implantation was shown to be associated with specific cell division timing parameters, introducing the term ‘morphokinetics’ (Meseguer et al., 2011).”
- Diagnosis of human preimplantation embryo viability. (2015, methodology): “Time-lapse observations have also been useful in defining new or poorly described concepts of embryology such as the duration of the first three cell cycles (Lemmen et al., 2008; Mio and Maeda, 2008; Meseguer et al., 2011) and furthermore, redefining traditionally used morphology parameters used for”
- Assessing efficacy of day 3 embryo time-lapse algorithms retrospectively: impacts of dataset type and confounding factors (2019, methodology): “…been commonly used in the recent timelapse studies, particularly when developing and/or validating an embryo selection algorithm in a dataset containing a significant number of double embryo transfer (DET) cycles (Basile et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2016; Meseguer et al., 2011; Petersen et al., 2016).”
- Time-lapse deselection model for human day 3 in vitro fertilization embryos: the combination of qualitative and quantitative measures of embryo growth. (2016, methodology): “Briefly, [1] if one was determined to be a poor-quality embryo (PQE) according to conventional morphology assessment at 68 hpi, it is categorized a grade F, otherwise subject to further criteria; [2] if one had displayed abnormal cleavage pattern(s) such as DC, RC, or <6 ICCP at the end of the 4-cel”