Diagnosis of human preimplantation embryo viability.
By D. Gardner, M. Meseguer, C. Rubio, N. Treff. 2015
176 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- Ethical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence to Select Embryos in In Vitro Fertilization (2021, methodology): “collected in this method limits the accuracy of embryo selection [5].”
- Time-lapse deselection model for human day 3 in vitro fertilization embryos: the combination of qualitative and quantitative measures of embryo growth. (2016, background): “01 hours, it is categorized a grade B, otherwise subject to further criteria; [6] if one had T5_PNF”
- Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance (2016, background): “Several studies are currently ongoing that investigate correlations among ‘-omic’ profiling, metabolism, spent culture media analysis and embryo quality (reviewed in Gardner et al., 2015).”
- Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer (2019, unknown): “indicate that Day 5 morphology alone is not the sole predictor of embryonic viability (Gardner et al., 2015), with glucose consumption being positively correlated with the ability of a blastocyst to give rise”