ARTICLE REVIEW OF RANDOLPH (2006) ‘A GUIDE TO WRITING THE DISSERTATION LITERATURE REVIEW

By Sadruddin Bahadur Qutoshi. 2013

500 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, History and Philosophy of Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a81925b809e329dfe997cfdef43973fe5b479ab3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. S. Thorne
2. K. Malterud
3. Trisha Greenhalgh
4. Norbert Steigenberger
5. Bongkosh Rittichainuwat
6. Suphaporn Rattanaphinanchai

In Statistics and Probability

1. Trisha Greenhalgh
2. S. Thorne
3. K. Malterud
4. Norbert Steigenberger

Citations in the corpus

• Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018, background): “Also of note is the emergence of “how-to” guides for narrative reviews, which (misleadingly in our view) exhort the reviewer to focus carefully on such tasks as starting with an explicit search strategy and defining strict inclusion and exclusion criteria for primary studies.(35,36) In other words, ”