The institutional basis of economic failure: anatomy of the segmented business system

By G. Wood, J. Frynas. 2006

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anthropology, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6b561c18600e56f6b769738daf0382717650b96

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anthropology

1. William Q. Judge
2. Ruth V. Aguilera

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Stav Fainshmidt
2. William Q. Judge
3. A. Saka-Helmhout
4. Adam Smith
5. Ruth V. Aguilera
6. Jonathan P. Doh
7. S. Rodrigues
8. C. Lane

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Ruth V. Aguilera
2. C. Lane
3. G. Wood
4. Stav Fainshmidt
5. William Q. Judge
6. Adam Smith
7. Jonathan P. Doh
8. Mona V. Makhija

Citations in the corpus

• Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries (2016, background): “When there is a lack of generalized trust, individuals and organizations rely on informal networks, centering on extended clan or family relationships as an organizing principle thus relying more on specific trust (Kong, 2015; Wood & Frynas, 2006).”
• Mapping the business systems of 61 major economies: A taxonomy and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems research (2018, unknown): “Subsequent works have since added insights on business systems in different regions of the world, including Africa (e.g. Wood and Frynas, 2006; Amaeshi and Amao, 2009), Asia (e.g. Kim, 2010; Boyer et al., 2012; Kalinowski, 2013; Witt and Redding, 2013; Zhang and Whitley, 2013), Eastern Europe (e.g.…”
• Capitalist diversity and diversity within capitalism (2009, background): “…aspects, such as practices of large-scale and often brutal imprisonment in the US, and indeed that have objectively negative implications for wider society, may be encountered together and persist, as long as they are conducive to influential interest groupings in society (Wood & Frynas, 2006).”
• Corporate Social Responsibility in Challenging and Non-enabling Institutional Contexts: Do Institutional Voids matter? (2014, unknown): “Other scholars highlight that the success or failure of market economies depend on how much they reflect the essential characteristics of the advanced capitalist political economies (Wood and Frynas 2006), which are the foundations of CSR in these economies.”
• Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study (2018, unknown): “The boundaries between formal and informal institutions are also often porous and permeable (Wood and Frynas 2006).”
• International business responses to institutional voids (2017, background): “Consistent with this, Wood and Frynas (2006) demonstrate that African business systems are characterized by deep and impermeable divisions between economic sectors, underpinned by elite interests in maintaining separation even at the expense of economic performance.”