Correlation of Significant Duration with Amplitude and Cumulative Intensity Measures and Its Use in Ground Motion Selection

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ground motion selection for scenario ruptures using the generalised conditional intensity measure (GCIM) method (2015, methodology): “As investigated and discussed by Bradley [16], Bradley [18], and Bradley [19], the residuals of duration and cumulative IMs have a relatively low correlation with each other, for example, ρ(Ds595, CAV) = 0.”
Physically Parameterized Prediction Equations for Significant Duration in Active Crustal Regions (2016, result): “vice-versa), which is consistent with prior work showing negative correlation between these ground motion intensity measures (Bradley 2011).”
The Purpose and Definition of the Minimum Magnitude Limit in PSHA Calculations (2017, methodology): “In the 50.54(f ) letter issued on the first anniversary of the Fukushima accident in which the Nuclear Regulatory Commission requested that all U.S. NPP owners update their seismic-hazard assessments, the following instructions: To remove non-damaging lower-magnitude earthquakes, addressees should e”