Stereotype Threat and Race of Interviewer Effects in a Survey on Political Knowledge

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Stereotype Threat and the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge (2006, methodology): “This finding is based on the response accuracies of African American respondents who correctly identified the race of their telephone interviewer (Davis & Silver, 2003).”
Revisiting Supplier Compliance with MNC Codes of Conduct: Recoupling Policy and Practice at Chinese Toy Suppliers (2014, background): “Previous research has found that this interview structure limits interviewer effects (cf. Boyd and Westfall 1965; Kvale 1996; Frenkel and Scott 2002; Davis and Silver 2003; Bryman 2004).”
Lying or Believing? Measuring Preference Falsification From a Political Purge in China (2016, background): “One place to look for such an instrument is interviewers’ characteristics, which have been found to have tangible impacts on both the quality and the content of responses in other contexts (Blaydes & Gillum, 2013; Davis & Silver, 2003; Schuman & Converse, 1971).”
Who’s Asking? Interviewer Coethnicity Effects in African Survey Data (2016, background): “Such questions might appear to involve little more than the reporting of basic facts, but, as Davis and Silver (2003) find in the U.S. context, because such self-reports have implications for one’s social status, they may be sensitive to who is asking.”