The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy
By J. Cheong. 2011
909 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6275c2af611f1ee7b3bc93793a230ee00b47e02
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- J. Frieden
- Stefanie Walter
- Vanessa P. G. Bretas
- Philipp Heimberger
- Mark Copelovitch
- Ilan Alon
- Yotam Margalit
- David Rueda
Citations in the corpus
- Distortions in the International Migrant Labor Market: Evidence from Filipino Migration and Wage Responses to Destination Country Economic Shocks (2012, neutral): “The view that very large distortions exist in the global market for migrant labor is widespread among economists (Clemens, Montenegro and Pritchett, 2011 and Rodrik, 2011).”
- Does economic globalisation affect income inequality? A meta‐analysis (2020, background): “The reason for including this variable named ‘DataHyperGlobalisation’ is that authors such as Rodrik (2011) argue that there was something special about the period of hyper-globalisation starting in the 1990s.”
- Populism and the economics of globalization (2018, neutral): “This is especially true of the advanced phases of globalization – what I have called elsewhere ‘‘hyperglobalization’’ (Rodrik, 2011) – in which the ratio of political/distributive costs to net economic gains is particularly unfavorable.”
- Why Does Globalization Fuel Populism? Economics, Culture, and the Rise of Right-wing Populism (2020, neutral): “…so much (Margalit 2019).2 My focus in this review, as in much of the economics-centered literature, is on the latter 1Readers are referred to Rodrik (1997, 2011) on the economic and social rifts created by advanced stages of globalization and to Rodrik (2018) for an earlier overview of the…”
- Research on international business: The new realities (2021, neutral): “As Rodrik (2011) argued, a nation cannot simultaneously pursue democracy, national selfdetermination, and economic globalization.”
- The Political Economy of the Euro Crisis (2016, background): “It also confronts European policymakers with an additional political trade-off between national autonomy and democratic accountability over fiscal policy, on the one hand, and financial and economic stability, on the other (Rodrik, 2011).”
- Franchising research on emerging markets: Bibliometric and content analyses (2021, background): “At the same time, the uneven distribution of gains from free trade hurt the losers of globalization, such as some developing countries (Meyer, 2017; Rodrik, 2011; Stiglitz, 2002).”