Populism and the economics of globalization

By Dani Rodrik. Journal of International Business Policy, 2018

1,265 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ee8c4def8a799df4908dcfd9851a08f98cb24b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Psychological Correlates of Populist Attitudes (2021, background): “…are expected to depend on grievances and perceived economic vulnerability (Hernández & Kriesi, 2016; Kriesi & Pappas, 2015; Rico & Anduiza, 2019; Rodrik, 2018), we add a dummy variable scoring 1 if the respondent is unemployed (either actively looking or not actively looking for a job) and 0…”
Research on international business: The new realities (2021, background): “…activities back to the home countries on the one hand, and the continuing pressure to keep cost down on the other, lead to new patterns of migration, that would privilege some workers over others and “unfree labour in contemporary economies” (Strauss, 2013, p. 180; see also Rodrik, 2018)?”
De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research (2019, background): “Arguably, this accounts at least partially for the election of Donald Trump as U.S. President and the global rise of populism more generally (Rodrik, 2018).”
Global crises and populism: the role of Eurozone institutions* (2019, methodology): “In our research we will rely on the most disaggregated level, namely NUTS3, to better capture the importance of local factors for populist consensus documented in the literature (e.g., Autor et al., 2016, 2017; Colantone and Stanig, 2017).”
International entrepreneurship in the post Covid world (2020, background): “Populist, nationalist and anti-globalization movements—with varying ideological agendas—have raised serious questions about the role of international institutions as well as who benefits from internationalization (Devinney & Hartwell, 2020; Rodrik, 2018).”
Populist Leaders and the Economy (2020, background): “Similarly, we code right-wing leaders that follow a ﬁerce “people vs. elites” script as populists, even if they adopt orthodox economic policies (Rodrik, 2018).”
Populism and Central Bank Independence (2017, neutral): “On globalization and populism, see Rodrik (2017).”
Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure (2020, positive): “2 percent for Fox News, 27.7 percent for CNN, and 13.1 percent for MSNBC. All regressions control for commuting zone, year, and age-race (three age times two race groups) fixed effects. Industry and occupation controls in column 3 include the fraction of CZ employment in the manufacturing sector and”
The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise (2019, background): “Few scholars have joined the call to study these developments more seriously as academic subject matter (e.g., Ozawa, 2019; Witt, 2019).”