Spitzer IRAC Confirmation of z850-Dropout Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Stellar Masses and Ages at z ≈ 7

By I. Labbé, R. Bouwens, G. Illingworth, M. F. C. Observatories, U. S. Cruz, L. Observatory. 2006

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Using Spitzer IRAC mid-infrared imaging from the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey, we study z850-dropout sources in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. After carefully removing contaminating flux from foreground sources, we clearly detect two z850 dropouts at 3.6 and 4.5 μm, while two others are marginally detected. The mid-infrared fluxes strongly support their interpretation as galaxies at z ≈ 7, seen when the universe was only 750 Myr old. The IRAC observations allow us for the first time to constrain the rest-frame optical colors, stellar masses, and ages of the highest redshift galaxies. Fitting stellar population models to the spectral energy distributions, we find photometric redshifts in the range 6.7-7.4, rest-frame colors U - V = 0.2-0.4, V-band luminosities LV = (0.6-3) × 1010 L☉, stellar masses (1-10) × 109 M☉, stellar ages 50-200 Myr, star formation rates up to ~25 M☉ yr-1, and low reddening AV < 0.4. Overall, the z = 7 galaxies appear substantially less massive and evolved than Lyman break galaxies or distant red galaxies at z = 2-3, but fairly similar to recently identified systems at z = 5-6. The stellar mass density inferred from our z = 7 sample is ρ* = 1.6 × 106 M☉ Mpc-3 (to 0.3L), in apparent agreement with recent cosmological hydrodynamic simulations, but we note that incompleteness and sample variance may introduce larger uncertainties. The ages of the two most massive galaxies suggest that they formed at z ≳ 8, during the era of cosmic reionization, but the star formation rate density derived from their stellar masses and ages is not nearly sufficient to reionize the universe. The simplest explanation for this deficiency is that lower mass galaxies beyond our detection limit reionized the universe.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5ff0554b2b8e1434f7a4fa7e8a39c1d733c1bc8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. V. van Dokkum
  2. M. Franx
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. Richard S. Ellis
  6. I. Labbé
  7. R. Somerville
  8. R. Bouwens

In Instrumentation

  1. P. V. van Dokkum
  2. M. Franx
  3. I. Labbé
  4. Richard S. Ellis
  5. R. Bouwens
  6. C. Conroy
  7. G. Illingworth
  8. P. Oesch

Citations in the corpus