Hubble Space Telescope and Spitzer Imaging of Red and Blue Galaxies at z ~ 2.5: A Correlation between Size and Star Formation Activity from Compact Quiescent Galaxies to Extended Star-forming Galaxies

By S. Toft, P. V. van Dokkum, M. Franx, I. Labbé, N. F. Förster Schreiber, S. Wuyts, Tracy Webb, G. Rudnick, Andrew Zirm, M. Kriek and 6 more. 2007

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present HST NICMOS+ACS and Spitzer IRAC+MIPS observations of 41 galaxies at 2 < z < 3.5 in the FIRES MS 1054 field with red and blue rest-frame optical colors. About half of the galaxies are very compact (effective radii re < 1 kpc) at rest-frame optical wavelengths; the others are extended (1 kpc < re < 10 kpc). For reference, 1 kpc corresponds to 0.12'' at z = 2.5 in the adopted cosmology. We separate actively star-forming galaxies from quiescent galaxies by modeling their rest-frame UV-NIR SEDs. The star-forming galaxies span the full range of sizes, while the quiescent galaxies all have re < 2 kpc. In the redshift range where MIPS 24 μm imaging is a sensitive probe of reradiated dust emission (z < 2.5), the 24 μm fluxes confirm that the light of the small quiescent galaxies is dominated by old stars, rather than dust-enshrouded star formation or AGN activity. The inferred surface mass densities and velocity dispersions for the quiescent galaxies are very high compared to those in local galaxies. The galaxies follow a Kormendy relation (between surface brightness and size) with approximately the same slope as locally, but shifted to brighter surface brightnesses, consistent with a mean stellar formation redshift of zf ~ 5. This paper demonstrates a direct relation between star formation activity and size at z ~ 2.5 and the existence of a significant population of massive, extremely dense, old stellar systems without readily identifiable counterparts in the local universe.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04decac61abb2007f90494357ad084572cd37662

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. P. V. van Dokkum
  4. R. Somerville
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. M. Franx
  7. A. Dekel
  8. Thomas J. Cox

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. P. V. van Dokkum
  4. M. Franx
  5. R. Somerville
  6. R. Dav'e
  7. Thomas J. Cox
  8. A. Dekel

Citations in the corpus