THE NEWFIRM MEDIUM-BAND SURVEY: PHOTOMETRIC CATALOGS, REDSHIFTS, AND THE BIMODAL COLOR DISTRIBUTION OF GALAXIES OUT TO z ∼ 3

By K. Whitaker, I. Labbé, P. V. van Dokkum, G. Brammer, M. Kriek, D. Marchesini, R. Quadri, M. Franx, A. Muzzin, Rik J. Williams and 8 more. 2011

316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present deep near-IR (NIR) medium-bandwidth photometry over the wavelength range 1–1.8 μm in the All-wavelength Extended Groth strip International Survey (AEGIS) and Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS) fields. The observations were carried out using the NOAO Extremely Wide-Field Infrared Imager (NEWFIRM) on the Mayall 4 m Telescope on Kitt Peak as part of the NEWFIRM Medium-Band Survey (NMBS), an NOAO survey program. In this paper, we describe the full details of the observations, data reduction, and photometry for the survey. We also present a public K-selected photometric catalog, along with accurate photometric redshifts. The redshifts are computed with 37 (20) filters in the COSMOS (AEGIS) fields, combining the NIR medium-bandwidth data with existing UV (Galaxy Evolution Explorer), visible and NIR (Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope and Subaru Telescope), and mid-IR (Spitzer/IRAC) imaging. We find excellent agreement with publicly available spectroscopic redshifts, with σz/(1 + z) ∼ 1%–2% for ∼4000 galaxies at z = 0–3. The NMBS catalogs contain ∼13,000 galaxies at z > 1.5 with accurate photometric redshifts and rest-frame colors. Due to the increased spectral resolution obtained with the five NIR medium-band filters, the median 68% confidence intervals of the photometric redshifts of both quiescent and star-forming galaxies are a factor of about two times smaller when comparing catalogs with medium-band NIR photometry to NIR broadband photometry. We show evidence for a clear bimodal color distribution between quiescent and star-forming galaxies that persists to z ∼ 3, a higher redshift than has been probed so far.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71ca0a225452969b3240e0337fa8b032ef8b7f41

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. P. V. van Dokkum
  4. C. Conroy
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. R. Somerville
  7. M. Franx
  8. Christopher J. Conselice

In Instrumentation

  1. P. V. van Dokkum
  2. C. Conroy
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. M. Franx
  6. R. Somerville
  7. R. Dav'e
  8. Christopher J. Conselice

Citations in the corpus