PRINTS and its automatic supplement, prePRINTS

By T. Attwood, Paul Bradley, Darren R. Flower, Anna Gaulton, N. Maudling, Alex L. Mitchell, G. Moulton, A. Nordle, K. Paine, Paul D. Taylor and 2 more. Nucleic Acids Res., 2003

411 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5c281348d922f813c98c1a761543c34289ac082

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Comparative Toxicogenomics Database: a knowledgebase and discovery tool for chemical–gene–disease networks (2008, background): “Protein sequence pages (associated with a Gene page) are, in turn, additionally linked to records from GenPept (14), InterPro (37), PRINTS (38), PROSITE (39), ProDom (40), SMART (41), Pfam (42) and, when appropriate, to a species-specific gene page in FlyBase (43) or ZFIN (44).”
New developments in the InterPro database (2007, methodology): “Reference InterPro is an integrated resource for protein families, domains and functional sites, which integrates the following protein signature databases: PROSITE, PRINTS, ProDom, Pfam, SMART, TIGRFAMs, PIRSF, SUPERFAMILY, Gene3D and PANTHER.”
The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) (2004, background): “InterPro is an integrated resource of protein families, domains and sites that amalgamates the efforts of the member databases: Pfam (14), PROSITE (15), PRINTS (16), ProDom (17), SMART (18), PIRSF (19), Superfamily (20) and TIGRFAMs (21).”
InterPro, progress and status in 2005 (2004, methodology): “InterPro (1) integrates into one resource the major protein signatures databases: PROSITE (2), which uses regular expressions and profiles, PRINTS (3), which uses position-specific scoring matrix-based (PSSM-based) fingerprints, ProDom (4), which uses automatic sequence clustering, and Pfam (5), SMA”
Annotation Error in Public Databases: Misannotation of Molecular Function in Enzyme Superfamilies (2009, background): “motifs [28–30], sequence profiles [31,32], and ortholog sets [33,34], are available for use in computational annotation.”
The TetR Family of Transcriptional Repressors (2005, background): “Interpro (258) assigns proteins to the TetR family based on PROSITE signature PS01081 (364), PRINTS motif PR00455 (15, 16), and Pfam Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile PF00440 (26, 27).”
InterPro in 2011: new developments in the family and domain prediction database (2011, methodology): “The InterPro database integrates predictive models, or signatures, from multiple, diverse source repositories: Pfam (1), PRINTS (2), PROSITE (3), SMART (4), ProDom (5), PIRSF (6), SUPERFAMILY (7), PANTHER (8), CATHGene3D (9), TIGRFAMs (10) and HAMAP (11).”
InterPro: the integrative protein signature database (2008, background): “InterPro (1) is an integrative database which was founded 10 years ago when the PROSITE (2), PRINTS (3), Pfam (4) and ProDom (5) databases formed a consortium to amal-gamate the predictive signatures they individually produced into a single resource.”
Diet and dioxins: the need to cut back. (2004, background): “Although there are many databases of sequence motifs available [20-23], these databases were created in a supervised way to have motifs that characterize different known protein families, domains, or functional sites.”
UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase (2004, background): “InterPro is an integrated resource of protein families, domains and sites that amalgamates the efforts of the member databases: Pfam (11), PROSITE (12), PRINTS ( 13 ), ProDom (14), SMART (15), PIRSF (16), Superfamily (17) and TIGRFAMs (18).”
Recent improvements to the PROSITE database (2004, methodology): “The PROSITE descriptors and documentation can also be accessed through InterPro, which largely exploits the detailed family annotation provided by PRINTS (7) and PROSITE.”
The SBASE domain sequence resource, release 12: prediction of protein domain-architecture using support vector machines (2004, neutral): “All domains are cross-referenced back to their parent protein databases [Swiss-Prot + TrEMBL (4), PIR (5) and to entries in other domain repositories, such as INTERPRO (6), or its member databases such as Pfam (7), SMART (8) and PRINTS (9)].”