PSYCHOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS OF ATTITUDE TOWARDS AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR GREEN ELECTRICITY
By André Hansla, Amelie Gamble, Asgeir Juliusson, Tommy Gärling. 2008
458 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5406f2d37752db81031017809e8b8e209112ed7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Svein Larsen
- Daniel Hanss
- Rouven Doran
- M. Roy
- Aindrila Biswas
- Chien-Wei Ho
- Pei-Ju Tung
- Hsueh-Mei Wang
In Marketing
In Sociology and Political Science
- M. Peterson
- Pei-Ju Tung
- Zhaohua Wang
- Aidan O'driscoll
- Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska
- Arthur P. J. Mol
- Mei‐Fang Chen
- Daniel Hanss
Citations in the corpus
- Paying for Mitigation: A Multiple Country Study (2012, unknown): “…forest losses caused by climate change (Layton and Brown 2000; Layton and Levine 2003), obtaining green electricity (Nomura and Akai 2004; Hansla et al. 2008), compensating for air travel emissions (Brouwer et al. 2008), taking mitigation actions (Akter and Bennet 2008), reducing…”
- Assessing the structure of UK environmental concern and its association with pro-environmental behaviour (2015, unknown): “Regarding these differences, the denial factor could be interpreted as mapping onto the egoistic component of the VBN; indeed, previous research has suggested a relationship between egoistic value orientation and denial (Hansla et al. 2008).”
- A Study of Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Green Products (2016, background): “context of willingness-to-pay for different product or service types in the backdrop of developed economies [19]-[21].”
- Valuing climate protection through willingness to pay for biomass ethanol (2009, background): “Several studies of consumer WTP for “green” electricity, including electricity generated from biomass energy sources, have been conducted since the late 1990s (e.g., Ethier et al., 2000; Zarnikau, 2003; Bergmann et al., 2006; Hansla et al., 2008; Longo et al., 2008).”
- Public Perceptions and Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy: A Case Study from Greece (2018, result): “Comparable results were proved, by a study on the factors influencing WTP for green electricity, noticing that a proactive attitude towards environmental issues can lead to a higher level of economic participation [41].”
- What makes consumers adopt to innovative energy services in the energy market? A review of incentives and barriers (2016, background): “To summarize what pushes people from intention to adopt to actual adoption is: a combination of perceived personal benefits as a consequence of adopting to the innovative energy service, compatibility with consumer’s values, identity and social references, strong social influence and normative belie”
- Developing an extended Theory of Planned Behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels (2014, background): “Environmental concern is a general attitude toward environental protection (Dunlap and Van Liere, 1978; Weigel and Weigel, 978), which is an important determinant of making people change heir behaviors to become more environmental friendly (e.g., amberg, 2003; Dunlap and Van Liere, 1978; Fransson an”
- Attitudes, efficacy beliefs, and willingness to pay for environmental protection when travelling (2015, background): “Other contexts in which attitudes have been associated with pro-environmental behaviour include, for instance, travel mode choice (e.g. Thøgersen, 2006), sustainable consumption (e.g. Tanner and Wölfing Kast, 2003) or energy conservation (e.g. Hansla et al., 2008).”
- Rural public acceptance of renewable energy deployment: The case of Shandong in China (Online first) (2013, result): “[16] indicated that willingness to pay for green electricity increased with a positive attitude towards green electricity that related to awareness of consequences of environmental problems and decreased with electricity costs, similar with the results proved by Bang et al.”
- Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward rooftop photovoltaic installation: The roles of personal trait, psychological benefit, and government incentives (2020, background): “The results show that the attitude toward rooftop PV installation has an impact on the intention for rooftop PV installation (H6), which is consistent with Batley et al.35 and Hansla et al.38 This finding verifies that TPB can be applied to the field of rooftop PV research.”