Expanding Access to Administrative Data for Research in the United States

By David Card, Raj Chetty, Martin Feldstein, Emmanuel Saez. 2010

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research (2018, unknown): “…optimal length of 16 For more information on researcher access to, and National Science Foundation (NSF) funding for, US administrative data, see (Card et al. 2010; Mervis 2014a; Moffitt 2016) and Cowen and Tabarrok (2016), the latter of which also calls for NSF funding of replications, open…”
Non-durable consumption and housing net worth in the Great Recession: Evidence from easily accessible data (2016, unknown): “There is a growing consensus among economists that transparency of empirical research should be an important goal for the profession, particularly when it concerns high profile findings that become influential in both academic and policy circles (Burman et al., 2010; Cochrane, 2015, 2016; Card et al”
The role of administrative data in the big data revolution in social science research. (2016, background): “Administrative social science data will generally provide much larger sample sizes than social surveys, and at times administrative social science data may cover the entire population of interest (Card et al., 2010).”
The Data Revolution and Economic Analysis (2014, methodology): “But as Card et al. (2010) point out, many European countries, such as Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, have gone much farther to facilitate research.”