The benefits of knowing what you know (and what you don’t): How calibration affects credibility

By Elizabeth R. Tenney, Barbara A. Spellman, R. MacCoun. 2008

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a49e5d304c062c3cc958ecf7795d4eca789b5b86

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Don A. Moore
2. Sunita Sah
3. R. MacCoun
4. J. Kennedy

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Don A. Moore
2. Sunita Sah
3. Cameron Anderson
4. Don A Moore
5. R. MacCoun
6. J. Kennedy
7. Francesca Gino
8. Adam D. Galinsky

In Philosophy

1. Sunita Sah
2. Don A. Moore
3. Don A Moore
4. R. MacCoun

Citations in the corpus

• Cheap talk and credibility: The consequences of confidence and accuracy on advisor credibility and persuasiveness (2013, methodology): “We conduct a conceptual replication of Tenney et al. (2007, 2008), exogenously manipulating confidence and accuracy in a new continuous judgment paradigm (with 5 confidence–accuracy pairings), and using two different dependent variables (perceived advisor credibility and actual behavioral…”
• When overconfidence is revealed to others: Testing the status-enhancement theory of overconfidence (2013, background): “Accordingly, those individuals might be penalized for their perceived hubris (Paulhus, 1998; Tenney & Spellman, 2010; Tenney et al., 2008).”