The influence of emotion on rational decision making in sexual aggression
By Jeffrey A. Bouffard. 2002
100 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a482d7bd10756eec133094556fea1fb65fbf9fb5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Michel Tuan Pham
- Robert Willison
- Jean‐Louis van Gelder
- Merrill Warkentin
- Alex R. Piquero
- Stephanie E Carmichael
- M. Delisi
- Wesley G. Jennings
In Gender Studies
- Michel Tuan Pham
- Robert Willison
- Jean‐Louis van Gelder
- Merrill Warkentin
- Alex R. Piquero
- Stephanie E Carmichael
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jean‐Louis van Gelder
- Stephanie E Carmichael
- Michel Tuan Pham
- Robert Willison
- Merrill Warkentin
- Alex R. Piquero
- Dan Nagin
- M. Delisi
Citations in the corpus
- Emotion and Rationality: A Critical Review and Interpretation of Empirical Evidence (2007, background): “For example, states of high sexual arousal increases people’s willingness to use unethical means of getting sex and decrease their willingness to practice safe sex (Ariely & Loewenstein, 2005; Bouffard, 2002).”
- Beyond Rational Choice: the Hot/Cool Perspective of Criminal Decision Making (2013, background): “A similar point applies to the ‘‘sneaky thrills’’ that are expected to result from minor property crime (see Katz, 1988), which also refers to anticipated consequences of conduct, and not emotions experienced at the moment of the decision itself (Bouffard, 2002).”
- Beyond Deterrence: An Expanded View of Employee Computer Abuse (2013, background): “Given this , of particular relevance to the current text are a number of deterrence studies ( Ariely and Lowenstein 2006 ; Bouffard 2002 ; Bouffard et al .”
- Sanctions, Perceived Anger, and Criminal Offending (2004, background): “In a similar study, Bouffard (2002a) randomly assigned male undergraduate students to view one of the following: a sexually arousing video, sexually arousing photographs, or sexually neutral photographs.”