Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): II. Perceptual basis

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Territorial Behavior in Dendrobatid Frogs (2005, unknown): “…individuals assess the resource holding power of competitors (e.g., Bee et al., 1999), along with mechanisms of individual recognition of neighbors (Bee and Gerhardt, 2001) and mates, are further promising areas of study in which dendrobatid frogs might provide optimal study systems (e.g., Bee,…”
The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis (2009, background): “fundamental frequency is positively correlated with dominant frequency; Bee & Gerhardt 2001 ), then repeatability estimates for the different attributes are not independent.”
Recognition and Localization of Acoustic Signals (2007, background): “…frequency and correlated spectral properties of frog calls depend on the size of the vocal folds in the larynx, which is related to overall body size (Martin 1972), and these properties are often the best acoustic predictors of male body size (Robertson 1986; Wagner 1989a; Bee and Gerhardt 2001a).”
Sounds and size: identification of acoustic variables that reflect body size in hamadryas baboons, Papio hamadryas (2006, background): “…that are related to body size, because body size frequently determines fighting ability (so far shown only in males) and reproductive success (shown in both sexes; Clutton-Brock & Albon 1979; Anderson 1986; Bercovitch 1987; Kuester et al. 1995; Poole 1999; Bee & Gerhardt 2001; Reby & McComb 2003).”