Outcomes of the International Union of Crystallography Commission on Powder Diffraction Round Robin on Quantitative Phase Analysis: samples 1a to 1h

By I. Madsen, N. Scarlett, L. Cranswick, T. Lwin. 2001

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a3b658deb82ba249f26df56ba56af55bae9b0a06

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

1. V. Kocaba
2. I. Madsen
3. N. Scarlett

In Materials Chemistry

1. V. Kocaba
2. I. Madsen
3. N. Scarlett
4. A. Kern
5. R. Snellings
6. Karen L. Scrivener
7. Hongjian Du
8. K. Tan

Citations in the corpus

• Outcomes of the International Union of Crystallography Commission on Powder Diffraction Round Robin on Quantitative Phase Analysis: samples 2, 3, 4, synthetic bauxite, natural granodiorite and pharmaceuticals (2002, methodology): “In sample 1 (Madsen et al., 2001) the introduction of a sizeable microabsorption correction into a system in which very little was required produced increased errors in the results.”
• Description and survey of methodologies for the determination of amorphous content via X-ray powder diffraction (2011, background): “Since microabsorption is one of the greatest impediments to accuracy in QPA [28, 29] a system with constant chemistry was chosen so that the overall mass absorption contrast did not vary as a function of phase composition, hence minimising the chances of inducing a microabsorption problem.”
• Rietveld Quantitative Phase Analysis of OPC Clinkers, Cements and Hydration Products (2012, unknown): “…specific publications dealing with this subject including reproducible sample preparation, fast data acquisition and fast-and-robust data analysis (Moller 1998; Manias et al. 2001; Scarlett et al. 2001; Fullmann and Walenta 2003; Paul et al. 2004; Enders and Berger 2007; De la Torre et al. 2011).”
• The HighScore suite (2014, background): “We refer the reader to the appropriate literature for further reading (see Madsen et al., 2001).”
• Development and evaluation of methods to follow microstructural development of cementitious systems including slags (2009, methodology): “Several advances in research reported in the literature [17-19] have used the Rietveld method and have shown that it is well adapted to quantify the phase composition of anhydrous cements.”
• Does Ordinary Portland Cement contain amorphous phase? A quantitative study using an external standard method (2011, unknown): “The impact of the atomic displacement parameters on the scale factors was also described by Madsen et al. 2001 , who assumed that errors made when using incorrect values for the atomic displacement parameters are propagated to the quantitative analysis.”
• Quantification of phases with partial or no known crystal structures (2006, methodology): “DOI: 10.1154/1.2362855 Key words: powder diffraction, Rietveld, quantitative phase analysis I. INTRODUCTION The Rietveld method Rietveld, 1969 is one of the most commonly used means for the quantification of powdered mixtures using diffraction data Madsen et al., 2001 .”