Outcomes of the International Union of Crystallography Commission on Powder Diffraction Round Robin on Quantitative Phase Analysis: samples 2, 3, 4, synthetic bauxite, natural granodiorite and…

By N. Scarlett, I. Madsen, L. Cranswick, T. Lwin, Edward G. Groleau, G. Stephenson, Mark Aylmore, Nicki Agron-Olshina. 2002

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd3ceafdfb70b934242498570b2767517c98e52e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

1. I. Madsen
2. N. Scarlett
3. V. Kocaba

In Materials Chemistry

1. A. Kern
2. I. Madsen
3. N. Scarlett
4. R. Snellings
5. V. Kocaba

Citations in the corpus

• Rietveld Quantitative Phase Analysis of OPC Clinkers, Cements and Hydration Products (2012, unknown): “Round robin (inter-laboratory) studies of RQPA were initially carried out for several types of samples but not OPCs (Toraya et al. 1999; Madsen et al. 2001; Scarlett et al. 2002).”
• Description and survey of methodologies for the determination of amorphous content via X-ray powder diffraction (2011, methodology): “Since microabsorption is one of the greatest impediments to accuracy in QPA [28, 29] a system with constant chemistry was chosen so that the overall mass absorption contrast did not vary as a function of phase composition, hence minimising the chances of inducing a microabsorption problem.”