Does understanding negation entail affirmation?: An examination of negated metaphors

By Uri Hasson, S. Glucksberg. 2006

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a3b402c18161f18984829bae4b16ca664e0aa40f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Eye-movements and ERPs reveal the time course of processing negation and remitting counterfactual worlds. (2008, unknown): “However, the exact time course of this shift from the negated concept to an alternative interpretation is still under debate (cf. Hasson & Glucksberg, 2006).”
Antonymy and negation (2006, methodology): “Hasson and Glucksberg (2006) and Kaup et al. (2006) assume a juxtapositon of the negated state of affairs with the representation of the described situation which suggests that both construals are needed for our understanding of negated meanings.”
How negation is understood: Evidence from the visual world paradigm (2014, background): “…of the display of the input, most of the paradigms applied thus far in research on negation have opted for using a discrete delay (150–250– 500–750–1500 ms) between the sentences and the pictures (see Hasson & Glucksberg, 2006; Kaup et al., 2006; Lüdtke, Friedrich, De Filippis, & Kaup, 2008).”
Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: Is a door that is not open mentally closed? (2006, background): “Similarly, in a recent study by Hasson and Glucksberg (2006) participants were presented with affirmative and negative metaphors (e.g., My lawyer is/is not a shark) and subsequently solved a lexical decision task, with the probes being either affirmative-related (e.g., vicious) or negative-related…”
Negation: A theory of its meaning, representation, and use (2012, background): “In a study of metaphors, Hasson and Glucksberg (2006) examined the comprehension of affirmative metaphors, such as, ‘‘my lawyer is a shark’’, and their negations, ‘‘my lawyer is not a shark’’.”