Negation: A theory of its meaning, representation, and use

By Sangeet S. Khemlani, Isabel Orenes, Philip N. Johnson-Laird. 2012

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cultural Studies, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b767a9db2ad1b3df2db427582accae666e3a8131

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Ruth M. J. Byrne
2. Orlando Espino

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Ruth M. J. Byrne
2. Orlando Espino

Citations in the corpus

• How negation is understood: Evidence from the visual world paradigm (2014, unknown): “…is consistent with the possibility that negation is represented symbolically, likely as a mental tag (Beltrán, Orenes, & Santamaría, 2008; Clark & Chase, 1972; Giora, 2006; Giora, Fein, Aschkenazi, & AlkabetsZlozover, 2007; Khemlani et al., 2012; Mayo, Schul, & Burnstein, 2004; Schul, 2011).”
• Thinking About the Opposite of What Is Said: Counterfactual Conditionals and Symbolic or Alternate Simulations of Negation (2018, background): “Hence, the mental representation of negation may be as iconic as possible but may include symbolic annotations, such as a propositional-like tag, “no” or some other symbol to capture negation (e.g., Byrne & Johnson-Laird, 2009; JohnsonLaird & Byrne, 2002; Johnson-Laird, Byrne, & Schaeken, 1992; Khem”