Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: Is a door that is not open mentally closed?
By Barbara Kaup, Jana Lüdtke, Rolf A. Zwaan. 2006
289 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbabb934e5d9d292eefc635733e48040524165d0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Orlando Espino
- Ruth M. J. Byrne
- David Beltrán
- C. Santamaría
- Caroline Willners
- Carita Paradis
- Isabel Orenes
- Shane Timmons
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Ruth M. J. Byrne
- David Beltrán
- C. Santamaría
- Caroline Willners
- Carita Paradis
- Isabel Orenes
- Orlando Espino
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Caroline Willners
- Ruth M. J. Byrne
- David Beltrán
- C. Santamaría
- Carita Paradis
- Isabel Orenes
- Orlando Espino
Citations in the corpus
- Thinking About the Opposite of What Is Said: Counterfactual Conditionals and Symbolic or Alternate Simulations of Negation (2018, background): “However, negation in everyday conversation is often used to deny, to communicate deviations from expectancies, to counter-argue, and so on (e.g., Kaup et al., 2006; Khemlani et al., 2012; Mayo et al., 2004; Wason & Jones, 1963).”
- Eye-movements and ERPs reveal the time course of processing negation and remitting counterfactual worlds. (2008, unknown): “Most research has compared affirmative and negative sentences in isolation (Hasson & Glucksberg, 2006; Just & Carpenter, 1971; Kaup et al., 2006; McDonald & Just, 1989; Wason, 1961), or following a supportive context (e.g. Giora, Fein, Aschkenazi & Alkabets-Zlozover, 2007; Glenberg, Robertson,…”
- NegAIT: A new parser for medical text simplification using morphological, sentential and double negation (2017, background): “Most research on the effects of negation has focused on sentential negation [22-24, 28, 29].”
- How negation is understood: Evidence from the visual world paradigm (2014, methodology): “With respect to the timing of the display of the input, most of the paradigms applied thus far in research on negation have opted for using a discrete delay (150–250– 500–750–1500 ms) between the sentences and the pictures (see Hasson & Glucksberg, 2006; Kaup et al., 2006; Lüdtke, Friedrich, De Fili”
- Antonymy and negation (2006, methodology): “Hasson and Glucksberg (2006) and Kaup et al. (2006) assume a juxtapositon of the negated state of affairs with the representation of the described situation which suggests that both construals are needed for our understanding of negated meanings.”