The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour
By A. S. R. Manstead. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2018
698 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Drawing on recent research on the psychology of social class, I argue that the material conditions in which people grow up and live have a lasting impact on their personal and social identities and that this influences both the way they think and feel about their social environment and key aspects of their social behaviour. Relative to middle‐class counterparts, lower/working‐class individuals are less likely to define themselves in terms of their socioeconomic status and are more likely to have interdependent self‐concepts; they are also more inclined to explain social events in situational terms, as a result of having a lower sense of personal control. Working‐class people score higher on measures of empathy and are more likely to help others in distress. The widely held view that working‐class individuals are more prejudiced towards immigrants and ethnic minorities is shown to be a function of economic threat, in that highly educated people also express prejudice towards these groups when the latter are described as highly educated and therefore pose an economic threat. The fact that middle‐class norms of independence prevail in universities and prestigious workplaces makes working‐class people less likely to apply for positions in such institutions, less likely to be selected and less likely to stay if selected. In other words, social class differences in identity, cognition, feelings, and behaviour make it less likely that working‐class individuals can benefit from educational and occupational opportunities to improve their material circumstances. This means that redistributive policies are needed to break the cycle of deprivation that limits opportunities and threatens social cohesion.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a393d52ede64fea5c28735250ec78dcc219b4b1e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Jose Eos Trinidad
- Ronnel B. King
- John T. Jost
- Aaron C. Kay
- H. Thórisdóttir
- D. Bar-Tal
- Eran Halperin
- Jaime L. Napier
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jose Eos Trinidad
- Ronnel B. King
- John T. Jost
- Aaron C. Kay
- H. Thórisdóttir
- D. Bar-Tal
- Eran Halperin
- Jaime L. Napier
Citations in the corpus
- Growth mindset predicts achievement only among rich students: examining the interplay between mindset and socioeconomic status (2021, background): “2011; Manstead 2018; Markus and Stephens 2017; Miyamoto et al.”
- A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications (2018, background): “What is remarkable tome is that disadvantaged groups – such asmembers of theworking class – subscribe to the legitimacy of the status quo asmuch as they do (Jost, 2017; see also Manstead, 2018).”