Just how important is spatial coincidence to multisensory integration? Evaluating the spatial rule

By Charles Spence. 2013

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sensory Systems

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “By contrast, the McGurk effect seems not to be influenced by the spatial disparity between the visual and auditory stimulus (Jones and Munhall, 1997; Jones and Jarick, 2006; see Spence, 2013, for a review).”
The effect of synesthetic associations between the visual and auditory modalities on the Colavita effect (2015, background): “In interactions in which space is task relevant or involving overt or covert attentional, spatial colocation also facilitates multisensory integration (for a review, see Spence 2013).”
Multisensory feature integration in (and out) of the focus of spatial attention (2019, background): “That said, as highlighted by Spence (2013), closer inspection of the literature soon reveals that spatial co-occurrence mostly only appears to be necessary in those situations where space is somehow made relevant (either explicitly or implicitly) to a participant’s task.”
The Curious Incident of Attention in Multisensory Integration: Bottom-up vs. Top-down (2016, unknown): “Particularly, spatial proximity seems to be relevant in tasks involving spatial attention and requiring orienting responses (see Spence, 2013 for a review).”
The ventriloquist in periphery: impact of eccentricity-related reliability on audio-visual localization. (2013, background): “This finding suggests that multisensory principles derived from unicellular experiment carried out in the superior colliculus (Stein and Meredith, 1993) are not straightforward in their explanation of multisensory phenomena at the level of perception and behavior (Spence, 2013).”
Eccentricity dependent auditory enhancement of visual stimulus detection but not discrimination (2013, background): “The nature of auditory presentation can have critical implications for the interpretation of audio–visual congruency effects as highlighted recently (Spence, 2013).”