Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs

570 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Biological Records Centre: a pioneer of citizen science (2015, background): “The information content of a dataset of unstructured, incidental records can be dramatically increased if recorders make small changes to their behaviour (Tulloch et al., 2013; Isaac & Pocock, 2015).”
Statistics for citizen science: extracting signals of change from noisy ecological data (2014, unknown): “making (Schmeller et al. 2009; Tulloch et al. 2013).”
The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science (2014, background): “Tulloch et al. (2013) reviewed the efficacy of various citizen-science approaches, and recommended a series of actions that could improve the impact and utility of citizen-science data.”
Analytical guidelines to increase the value of community science data: An example using eBird data to estimate species distributions (2021, background): “…visit locations that are close to where they live (Dennis & Thomas, 2000; Mair & Ruete, 2016), are more accessible (Botts et al., 2011; Kadmon et al., 2004), contain high species diversity (Hijmans et al., 2000; Tulloch et al., 2013) or are within protected areas (Tulloch et al., 2013).”