Cognitive Distortion and Problem Behaviors in Adolescents
By Alvaro Q. Barriga, Jennifer R. Landau, B. Stinson, Albert Kien Liau, J. Gibbs. 2000
207 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Behavioral Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2db480211794f213eda0b42ec93fa684612a36c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- What Have We Learned from Five Decades of Neutralization Research? (2005, background): “John C. Gibbs and his colleagues (Gibbs, Potter, and Goldstein 1995; Barriga et al. 2000) developed a more coherent and rigorously evaluated framework of criminal thinking patterns including "blaming others," "minimizing" or mislabeling, and "assuming the worst" (see also Slaby and Guerra 1988).”
- A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions † (2006, background): “It can be seen from these definitions that Abel et al. (1989) and Murphy (1990) conceptualized cognitive distortions in offenders as self-serving biases (see Barriga et al., 2000), an implication that is not present in Beck's work.”
- Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression (2010, unknown): “The third framework of moral neutralization is rooted in the concept of cognitive distortions or thinking errors (Ellis 1962; Beck 1963) and was developed in the context of young offender rehabilitation by Gibbs and colleagues (Barriga and Gibbs 1996; Barriga et al. 2000; Gibbs et al. 1995).”
- Moral judgement, cognitive distortions and empathy in incarcerated delinquent and community control adolescents (2006, result): “This is in line with the findings of Barriga et al. (2001), and supports the idea that cognitive distortions have a moderating role in the relation between moral maturity and antisocial behaviour.”
- Moral Cognition: Explaining the Gender Difference in Antisocial Behavior (2001, background): “Third, the moral cognitive variables in our study previously have been found to display a different pattern of correlations with internalizing than externalizing behavior in controlled analyses (Barriga, 1996; Barriga et al., 2000).”