The EPPO prioritization process for invasive alien plants

By S. Brunel, E. Branquart, Guillaume Fried, J. V. Valkenburg, G. Brundu, U. Starfinger, S. Buholzer, A. Uludağ, M. Joseffson, R. Baker. 2010

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Risk assessment, eradication, and biological control: global efforts to limit Australian acacia invasions (2011, result): “When we attempted other such schemes (e.g. Brunel et al., 2010), similar results were obtained.”
An inventory of invasive alien species in China (2012, background): “At present, several studies have proposed prioritization methods for the management of weeds (e.g., Skinner et al. 2000, Virtue et al. 2001, Robertson et al. 2003, Tassin et al. 2006, Randall et al. 2008, Brunel et al. 2010).”
Predicting distributions of invasive species (2013, background): “…for those likely to become pests (i.e. likely to cause harm), monitoring programs can target areas most likely to be infested, arrangements can be established for cost-sharing between jurisdictions over a large region and so on (Brunel et al., 2010; Cook et al., 2007; Richardson & Thuiller, 2007).”
Species‐based risk assessments for biological invasions: advances and challenges (2013, background): “A few RAs are, however, multitaxon oriented (Brunel et al., 2010; Essl et al., 2011), allowing for the same RA to be used for several taxa.”