Species‐based risk assessments for biological invasions: advances and challenges

By S. Kumschick, D. Richardson. 2013

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2903daa159458cc8f9858a5ddfb2c0ec954e5f46

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Insect Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Advancing impact prediction and hypothesis testing in invasion ecology using a comparative functional response approach (2014, methodology): “…challenge for the management of invasive species (Ricciardi and Rasmussen 1998; Parker et al. 1999; Byers et al. 2002; Andersen et al. 2004; Kumschick et al. 2012; Leung et al. 2012; Kumschick and Richardson 2013), and impact is usually not satisfactorily included in RAs (Kumschick et al. 2012).”
Risk Analysis and Bioeconomics of Invasive Species to Inform Policy and Management (2016, background): “Questionnaire and statistical tools have high accuracy (75–92%) across a range of taxonomic groups, habitats, and regions (58); see Supplemental Table 1.”
The importance of assessing positive and beneficial impacts of alien species (2020, background): “…(Martinez-Cillero 2019), and many risk assessment frameworks, evaluate deleterious socio-economic impacts (for a review of impact assessment frameworks see Strubbe et al. 2019 and Vilà et al. 2019; for a review of risk assessment frameworks see Leung et al. 2012 and Kumschick and Richardson 2013).”
Comparing impacts of alien plants and animals in Europe using a standard scoring system (2015, background): “Many risk assessments for alien species include mainly environmental impacts (Kumschick & Richardson 2013), whereas until recently, systems for plant health such as the pest risk assessment scheme of the European Plant Protection Organization (EPPO 2011) mainly included socio-economic impacts (but…”
Invasive plants as drivers of regime shifts: identifying high‐priority invaders that alter feedback relationships (2014, background): “…Australian Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) system asks only general questions to determine whether the taxon under assessment is known to, or has the potential to alter the composition, structure, or normal processes or function of a natural ecosystem (Gordon et al., 2010; Kumschick & Richardson, 2013).”
Harmonia+ and Pandora+: risk screening tools for potentially invasive plants, animals and their pathogens (2015, background): “Although the field of risk analysis of invasive alien species has seen much progress in recent years, a considerable scope for improvement is still left (see reviews by Leung et al. 2012; Kumschick and Richardson 2013).”
How do invasive species travel to and through urban environments? (2017, background): “cost effective than those that respond to incursions (Hulme 2006; Pyšek and Richardson 2010; Kumschick and Richardson 2013; Faulkner et al. 2016a).”
Ecological Impacts of Alien Species: Quantification, Scope, Caveats, and Recommendations (2015, methodology): “Scoring systems have been used to identify traits of alien mammals and birds associated with high levels of impact (Nentwig et al. 2010, Kumschick et al. 2013) and have shown that the diversity of habitats that an alien species can occupy could be a useful parameter in models predicting that…”