Age and age of acquisition: An evaluation of the cumulative frequency hypothesis

By Catriona M. Morrison, K. Hirsh, Tameron D. Chappell, Andrew W. Ellis. 2002

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2b39a3689f194bb32d3ad0237e68680b327d926

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Age of acquisition and lexical processing (2006, background): “Morrison et al. (2002) tested the prediction from the cumulative frequency hypothesis that AoA effects should be smaller in elderly than in younger participants, as the difference between the cumulative frequencies of early and later acquired words will reduce with age.”
Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. (2005, methodology): “…by participants but not by items. c Results reported are from the young adults in Morrison et al. (2002) . d Results reported are from the 60-to 69-year-old group in Morrison et al. (2002). e Results reported are from the age 80ϩ group in Morrison et al. (2002). f Results reported are…”
The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks : A never ending story ? (2004, unknown): “…2002; Bonin, Fayol, & Chalard, 2001b; Carroll & White, 1973; Ellis & Morrison, 1998; Gilhooly & Gilhooly, 1979; Morrison, Ellis, & Quinlan, 1992; Morrison et al., 2002; Vitkovitch & Tyrrell, 1995); (5) written picture naming (Bonin et al., 2001b, 2002); (6) ed. spelling to dictation (Bonin&M…”
Age-related effects on speech production: A review (2006, background): “In contrast to the priming and homophone production studies, studies in which lexical properties of to-be-named objects are varied provide little evidence that a lexical access deficit underlies the slow picture naming in older adults (Mitchell, 1989; Morrison et al., 2002; Poon & Fozard, 1978; Thom”
The effect of age of acquisition: Partly frequency related, partly frequency independent (2006, background): “For instance, Rodd (2003) observed that participants found it more difficult to reject the stimulus word leotard as an animal than to reject a matched control word that did not orthographically resemble the name of an animal, presumably because the meaning of the orthographically related word (leopa”