The effect of age of acquisition: Partly frequency related, partly frequency independent
By Marc Brysbaert, Mandy Ghyselinck. 2006
171 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37584f59f119abe88a78a48799142302f83799c2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Peter Indefrey
- C. Barry
- Marc Brysbaert
- Victor Kuperman
- Robert A. Johnston
- Jana Hanulová
- Douglas J. Davidson
- Hans Stadthagen-González
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Peter Indefrey
- Victor Kuperman
- C. Barry
- Marc Brysbaert
- Robert A. Johnston
- Jana Hanulová
- Douglas J. Davidson
- Hans Stadthagen-González
Citations in the corpus
- Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words (2012, background): “A promising variable to add to the big four is AoA, or the age at which a word was learned (for reviews, see Brysbaert & Ghyselinck, 2006; Ghyselinck, Lewis, & Brysbaert, 2004; Johnston & Barry, 2006; Juhasz, 2005).”
- Where does the delay in L2 picture naming come from? Psycholinguistic and neurocognitive evidence on second language word production (2011, background): “In the section headed “The role of age-of-acquisition (AoA)”, we have already discussed the three main hypotheses about the causes of the AoA effect in monolingual production, each placing it at a difference locus within the word production system—at phonological retrieval (eg, Barry et al, 2001; Br”
- Age of acquisition and lexical processing (2006, background): “Brysbaert and Ghyselinck (this issue 2006 ) initiate such work by their consideration of “frequency-related” and “frequency-independent” AoA effects.”