Response Order Effects in Dichotomous Categorical Questions Presented Orally The Impact of Question and Respondent Attributes

By Allyson Holbrook, J. Krosnick, David W. Moore, Roger Tourangeau. 2007

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a26b88bffcffbd8435ae30263d502bdc8e5a205b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Kristen Olson

In Sociology and Political Science

1. A. Jäckle
2. J. Billiet
3. Kristen Olson
4. Katrin Auspurg
5. Olena Kaminska
6. Allan L. McCutcheon
7. Robert W. Motl
8. C. Distefano

In Statistics and Probability

1. J. Billiet
2. Kristen Olson
3. A. Jäckle
4. Katrin Auspurg
5. Olena Kaminska
6. Allan L. McCutcheon
7. Evelina Gulbovaitė
8. Jolita Vveinhardt

Citations in the corpus

• An Examination of Questionnaire Evaluation by Expert Reviewers (2010, methodology): “The number of expert reviewers tends to be small, ranging from two or three expert methodologists (Presser and Blair 1994; Theis et al. 2002; Jansen and Hak 2005; Holbrook et al. 2007) to over 20 reviewers (Willis et al.”
• First Equals Most Important? Order Effects in Vignette-Based Measurement (2017, background): “In long questionnaires, order effects have been found to be more pronounced for questions placed late in the questionnaire (Holbrook et al. 2007).”
• Satisficing Among Reluctant Respondents in a Cross-National Context (2010, methodology): “The four indirect indicators include education and age, the most commonly used proxy variables for cognitive ability (Ceci 1991; Holbrook et al. 2007; Krosnick and Alwin 1987; Krosnick 1991; Krosnick, Narayan, and Smith 1996; Krosnick et al. 2002), as well as the interviewers evaluation of…”